|
|
Possibility of meeting with IMAM (A.S) In
major Occultation:
History of both minor
and major occultation’s is a witness to the fact that. anyone who sought
guidance received it, From Imam (A.S.). Today also if anyone sincerely,
seeks guidance will receive it from 'Imam (A.S.)'
Committing oneself completely to the wisdom and expediencies of Allah is
mandatory on the representative of Allah, as Allah bestows the
responsibility of guiding and leadership to those who not only stick to
ordinance of Allah but their intentions are also guided by the desire and
pleasure of Allah. As a result statements that flow from his mouth bear His
assent. Contradicting the desire of Allah is a sin and a sinner cannot reach
this office. Keeping the above principle in mind, we have to conclude that
all Imams necessarily followed the commands of Allah and his actions, words
and assent reflect the prescription of Allah. Now if Imam is apparent it
concurrents with command of Allah, speaks at Allah's behest, his silence
bears the assent of Allah, travels and migrates for Allah's pleasure,
remains hidden from nation at His dictates, goes into occultation at His
dictates, chooses his representatives in minor occultation subscribing to
His will. In short, he follows and concedes to all injunctions of Allah.
After presenting this prologue we intend to plunge directly to our main
discussion . "Whether it is possible to meet Jmam-e-Asr in his
major occultation?"
Possibility of doubt would not have been there if people had gone through
the Tawqee' (letter of Imam) which Imam sent to his fourth and last
representative, Ali bin Mohammad-e-Saimuri. After informing him of his (Ali
ibn Mohammad) death Imam said :
"...soon a time shall come when my Shias will claim to have met me.
Beware! For the one who claims that, he has met me before the uprising of
Sufyani and a call from the sky is a liar and a deceiver."
Even after this clear 'Tawqee' some pious and sanctimonious scholars and
sincere people described their meeting of Imam (A.S.), and they arc such
people whose trustworthiness is beyond question. In this contradictory
circumstance it becomes rather difficult, to asses the true position.
Rejecting the words of Islam is near to blasphemy, while rejecting the pious
people, whose integrity is beyond doubt is not, acceptable to one's self.
Also no other person can come in countenance of Tmam(A.S.). In such
paradoxical circumstances we have to after all reach a conclusion. In
reality, people have not understood the essence of' Tawqee' as it does not,
deny the possibility of meeting Ilazrat Baqiyatullah (may our live be
sacrificed for him) in major occultation. Rather it comes heavily on pseudos
selling the idea of being an ambassador. In other words, this points to
those who claim to be emissaries and deputies of Imam (A.S.) like •Ali
Mohammad Shirazi. It is a lamentable fact, that like other scripts of Imam
(A.S.) this 'Tawqee' also was not able to acquire due attention from Shia
cadres. Shia scholars and masses alike have not pondered upon it. Otherwise
the artificial and pseudo special deputies and Mahdis would not have made
their claims.
The statement of the 'Tawqee' that some people will will claim to have met.
me can be interpreted as those who will come forward and proclaim on the top
of their voices in order to market their fabricated ideas, under the garb of
meeting Imam and taking instructions directly from him. Mention can also l)e
made of those people who falsely claimed to have met Imam (A.S.) due to
social disturbances. It would not be wrong to mention that apart from false
claimants of deputyship in the present century there were many individuals
who sold their satanic ideas under the label of 'Basharat'.
Without going in much detail, let us analyze and find out, the meaning of
the word 'Ghaibat', as its correct interpretation is of paramount importance
in our discussions. But, again people have a very superficial understanding
of the word 'Ghaibat'. The word is derived from the infinitive 'Ghaib' which
means 'to be away'. The word is related to Imam (A.S.) in the same manner as
the sun which is not visible to the naked eye either due to the darkness of
night or impediment of clouds, but, its existence and presence is not
affected. Similarly Hazrat Wall-e-Asr is exists but is not seen by the
people.
There are two viewpoints about the 'Ghaibat' of Hazrat Wali-e-Asr. First
opinion which is prevalent among common masses and is also supported by the
apparent meaning of some traditions is that Imam is invisible in the sense
that people cannot see him but he can see them. He might be sitting in a
particular place but that place is felt as vacant. This view can be
supported by a tradition recorded by Sheikh-e-Sadook in his book 'Kama
luddin' from Kayyan bin Suit that Tmam-e-Reza (A.S.) in reply to a question
concerning 'Qaem' said : "Neither
his body can be seen, nor his name can be uttered"
(Vg-370).
As far as the safety and protection of lmam Mahdi (A.S.) is concerned, this
viewpoint is quiet simple to understand, straightforward and practical. He
stays in a secluded place away from all incoherence’s of society.
Second viewpoint categorically states that people are in a position to see
him but are unable to recognize him or are not attentive to it. They are
unaware ofh is personality and whereabouts. Imam Hasan-e-Askari (A.S.)
trained him secretly away from eyes of people but relaxing the rule for some
of his special companions. This was done intentionally to establish
thevicegerency of Hazrat, Wali-e-Asr (A.S.). After the sad demise of Imam
Hasan-e-Askari (A.S.) the veil of occultation was tightened and he was in
contact with masses through four special deputies. Only few reliable and
trustworthy Shias like Alt ibn Mahziyyar were fortunate enough to see him
but every time Imam exhorted them to maintain secrecy. With the passage of
time, minor occultation proceeded towards an end and all those companions of
Imam Hasan-e-Askari (AS.) who saw .Imam Mahdi (A.S.) passed away and a time
came when those who were aware of his features became virtually extinct, and
a new generation emerged who was totally ignorant about his peculiarities.
They were unable to recognize him even when he would be in their presence.
Traveling to any part of the world was not an impediment, for him.
After briefly explaining the two viewpoints about the occultation of Imam
(A.S.) the question arises about, the possibility of meeting imam in
occultation. There would not have been any room for such a question if the
tradition mentioned earlier would not have been there designating a person
who claims to have met. Imam (A.S.) as liar. We have mentioned this in no
unclear terms explaining its interpretation and in its light is the
following discussion based.
Whether viewing Imam (A.S.) physically is possible based on logic and
reasoning given two viewpoints about occultation? is the first, question to
be dealt, with. In reply to this, if we accept the first viewpoint about his
invisibility then conversation or meeting with him becomes impossible unless
and until a miracle takes place and at the will of Imam as and when the
situation so demands. But, as per second viewpoint only his name and
cognizance is hidden and we support, this view point with sufficient proofs
to substantiate our claim. There are three possibilities of meeting Imam
(AS.) :
(a) Meeting Imam Mahdi (A.S.) without, realizing that he is Imam and there
are scores of incidents in this regard.
(1)) Meeting Imam Mahdi (AS.) but becoming aware afterwards.
(c) To meet Imam and during conversation realize that he is talking with
Imam. These types of incidents are very few; may be due to complete
occultation this thing is kept secret.
Now if we accept the first viewpoint then meeting with Imam (A.S.) requires
a miracle, but as regards the other viewpoint we categorically refer to
benefit and need of Imam. Imam is essential to lead the society towards the
right path, purpose of meeting with people is relieving the group from
oppression, to alleviate a person from physical or economic harm or to show
the right path and so on but of course with will of Allah and within limits
of occultation.
After the above discussion the point has been made clear that meeting Imam
in occultation is not only possible but, sometimes the circumstances render
it essential. Statement of Tawqee' was meant, to caution people from
claimants who would fool the people. But as far as religious and pious
people are concerned many incidents have been recorded out, of which a few
are mentioned below :
1) Muhaddis-e-Qummi in book Muntahal Aamaal narrates an incident, from Mulla
Zainul Aabedin Salmasi about Allama Bahrul Uloom. Inciden pertains to those
days when Allama was staying in Mecca and giving lectures to Hanafi,
Shafaco, Malekei and Hanbali scholars. Salmasisays that one day he expressed
concern about the mounting expenses due to Allama's benevolence and the
situation had arrived when not, a single penny was left. Vet Salmasi did not
receive any reply.
The routine schedule of Allama consisted of him performing the
circumambulation of Kaaba, then going in a private chamber and after smoking
pipe going into another chamber where he used to give instructions and
verdicts in various schools of jurisprudence . Next, day when he just
started smoking somebody knocked at the door and to my astonishment Allama
him self quickly rushed to open the door instructing me to take the pipe
away. I saw a handsome man in the dress of Arabs, with a pleasing
personality who entered and sat in the room and Allama in utter humbleness
sat by the sidr of door and indicated me not to bring the pipe. A Her con
versing for some time the man stood up and Sayed himself opened the door and
made him ride the camel. Later Sayed returned and seemed perplexed. He gave
me a piece of paper and asked me to go to a money changer who was stationed
;it the hill of' Safa and to take whatever he gave.
I went there and handed over that note to him. He with great respect kissed
it and asked me to bring lour labourers. I did so and they were loaded with
franc riyals to the extent, they could carry. Once I went to Safa to inquire
about that money changer but to my astonishment 1 did not find a single shop
there. I inquired in the vicinity but they also assorted that they had never
seen any moneychanger there. I understood that it is a secret of Allah.
2) Mention in this regard can be made of another incident of Allama Bahrul
Uloom which is reported by Allama Majlisi (R.A). Aqa-e-Zainul Aabedin
Salmasi narrates that he was sitting in gathering ;)f Allama Bahrul Uloorn
and at, that time one per-lon questioned him about the possibility of
meeting [mam Mahdi (A.S.) Allama, who was holding a smoking pipe in his
hand,, put, aside the pipe and bending his head murmured in such a manner
that
I was able to heart it. He said, "What reply I should give to this
person? Although, Imam Mahdi has embraced me there are explicit traditions
calling a person liar who claims to have met him" After this he lifted
his head and replied, "It is narrated in the traditions that, one who
claims to have met Imam should he out rightly rejected." AUama did not
say a single word further.
From the above incidents it becomes clear that meeting Hazrat is possible
but propagating it, is not. permitted, so as to prevent its misuse by
self-centered people.
3) It is mentioned in Biharul Anwar (Vbl-53, Pg 255) by Allama Majlisi
(R.A.) that, Sheikh Baqir Kazmi narrates an incident of a barber who was
serving his old father. This pious person performed his duty to the extent
of helping him in going
to toilet. He never used to be away from his father except, on Wednesdays,
when he used to go to Masjid e-SahIa hut keeping the track of time. Not
seeing him for quite a few weeks. in Masjide Sahia, I (Sheikh Baqir Kazmi)
inquired from him the reason for not coming to Mosque. The barber explained
that he went for forty Wednesdays, but, on the fortieth time he was not,
able to proceed early.
He started in night, and was nearing his destination when suddenly his eyes
settled on a distant rider who apparently seemed to be an Arab nomad who was
heading towards him. When he came face to face he inquired about, his
destination in a nomadic dialect. He promptly replied, 'Masjid-e-SahIa'.
Then he (nomad) inquired whether he (barber) was having some eatables with
him, but he replied in negative. The Arab nomad again asked him to put his
hand in his pocket and to see whether he was having some eatables. He again
assured the Arab that he was having nothing. On his insistence he searched
his pocket and found some raisings which he had purchased for his small son
and had forgotten about, it.
Then the person pronounced thrice (in nomadic language) which meant, 'I
advise you concerning your father and disappeared. Then he (barber) realized
that the man was no other than Hazrat Hujjat who is not, happy to see me
remain negligent of my father even on Wednesdays.
4) Aqa-e-Haj Reza
Hamdani narrates in his book 'Misbah' that on some occasions Hazrat Hujjat
(A.S.) gives opportunity of seeing him to his selected and trustworthy
Shias. For instance, about fifty years back a pious scholar Abdur Rahim
Dimavandi was able to avail of this opportunity. He narrates that in ;i
complete darkness he met Hazrat, who was standing facing Qible and light was
emitting from his face. The light was so luminating that even the floor was
clearly visible along with its details.
Hajjatui Islam Wal Muslemeen Aqa-e-Shiekh Moiiammad Hamdani whose piousness
was beyond doubt and acclaimed by one and all, wrote that owe his wife was
in a semiconscious state and doctors had given up all hopes of her survian
that I prayed to Hazrat, on 22nd Safar, 1397 A.H. she was carried in
midnight.
In short, after considering the numerous incidents of meeting Hazrat and
also scy erase traditions we can conclude that :
a) It is absolutely absurd and false to claim that meeting with Hazrat can
be held at ones desire, without the some from Imam.
b) on other hand, if Hazrat himself wishes to honour somebody with the
opportunity to meet him is a different matter. In that case supplication are
very half face but acceptance of same depends, on Hazrat.
|